Depth
Surface System Data
Product How it works Technical depth
Apply for Pilot
Zone 01 — Surface

Your model learned
from your data.
Both can be compromised.

A poisoned training set turns your model into an attacker's tool. A single mislabeled class changes a prediction, a decision, an outcome your customer trusted. None of it shows up in your logs.

Antidote monitors your AI pipeline at the data layer — detecting, healing, and documenting poisoning, mislabels, and silent corruption before they shape your model, your outputs, or your reputation.

Poisoning healed Mislabels corrected Drift monitored Bias & Shortcuts detected Audit-ready reports
Pilot cohort limited to 10 teams · Q1 2026
// Antidote — Datasets Live
2 datasets13,552 samples 424 vulnerabilities
NameTypeSamplesStatusIssues
5008_Federalist_Papers.docx Text 1,840 ⚠ Warning 4
chest_xray_pneumonia 2D Image 11,712 ⚠ Warning 420
13,552 Samples scanned
424 Vulnerabilities
98% Health score
<4h Time to insight
// The threat is real — the numbers don't lie
241

Average days to identify and contain a data breach — a record low, yet still almost 8 months of undetected exposure.

Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, 2025
1–3%

Poisoning just 1–3% of training data is enough to significantly impair a model's ability to generate accurate predictions.

Source: digitalcommons.lasalle.edu; SentinelOne, 2025
250

Malicious documents needed to backdoor any LLM — regardless of model size. Model scale offers no protection.

Source: Anthropic, UK AI Security Institute & Alan Turing Institute, 2025 — arXiv:2510.07192
// Built by hackers, for builders

What Antidote actually delivers.

Clean data doesn't just reduce risk — it directly improves model performance, security posture, and compliance readiness.

// OUTCOME · 01
↑ Accuracy, ↓ Time
Higher ceiling, faster convergence

Removing mislabeled, poisoned, and low-quality samples raises the ceiling of what your model can achieve — and clean data means fewer epochs to get there. Less tuning wasted on noise. Faster iteration cycles. You reach your target accuracy sooner and at lower compute cost.

// OUTCOME · 02
↑ Security Posture
Eliminate hidden triggers before production

Detect and eliminate backdoors, adversarial patches, prompt injections, and poisoning attacks before they reach production. A model trained on clean data is a model without hidden triggers — and a security posture your investors can verify.

// OUTCOME · 03
↓ Training Cost
Stop spending compute on poisoned data

Catch data issues before training begins. Eliminate costly retraining cycles caused by corrupted datasets discovered post-deployment. Every hour of GPU time spent on bad data is budget you don't get back.

// OUTCOME · 04
↑ Compliance Coverage
Audit-ready before the regulator asks

Fully configurable audit reports aligned with GDPR and the EU AI Act. Each report section is a Data Field you control — define which fields appear, structure, and export format. Ready for regulators, investors, and enterprise procurement.

↓ entering the system
Zone 02 — System

How Antidote
actually works.

Our proprietary engines work in concert across your pipeline — from the moment data enters your system to the audit log that evidences its integrity. Each stage is configurable, explainable, and built for AI-specific threat vectors that general data quality tools were never designed to catch.

01 //
Detect

Statistical engines learn the internal structure and relationships of your data. Samples that deviate from learned representations are flagged — and sequential engines classify the type: mislabeled, poisoned, or low quality.

Unsupervised · No baseline needed
02 //
Remediate

Antidote can automatically relabel based on feature cluster position, remove poisoned or degraded samples, or queue for human review — configurable by confidence threshold to fit your workflow.

Auto · Manual · Hybrid
03 //
Explain

Every flagged sample is reviewable in the UI. Your team sees exactly what was changed, why it was changed, and the data's position in latent space. No black box. Complete visibility into the decision.

Latent space explorer · Sample preview
04 //
Report

Fully configurable audit reports — each section is a Data Field you control. Choose which fields appear, define the structure, and export in your preferred format. Aligned with GDPR and EU AI Act requirements.

GDPR · EU AI Act · Configurable export
Fully configurable reports

Every report is composed of Data Fields — you choose which fields appear, define the structure, and select your export format. Designed for compliance teams, security audits, and enterprise procurement. Every finding is traceable, every remediation documented, every report exportable on demand.

// Scan Details · Text Analysis Critical 3
5008_Federalist_Papers.docx · February 13th, 2026 · 4 seconds · TEXT ANALYSIS
Critical Sensitive Info Github Pat P8
Critical Sensitive Info Password Assignment P8
Critical Prompt Injection P13
Medium Off Topic P16
// Finding · Prompt Injection · P13
"Forget everything we've discussed so far." — instruction-like patterns detected that can redirect model behavior. May cause unsafe output, data leakage, or policy bypass.
// Dataset Health · chest_xray_pneumonia ⚠ Warning
Sample size
11,712
Detection rate
3.59%
Mislabel rate
3.6%
Outlier rate
0%
Scan coverage
100%
Labels / Classes
NORMAL PNEUMONIA
Observability tools
Watch what your model does.

Runtime and model-layer tools catch problems after the fact — after your model has already learned from compromised data. By then, the damage is inside the system.

React to output anomalies post-inference
Cannot inspect the data that built the model
Not designed for AI-specific attack vectors
Antidote
Watch what your model ingests.

Antidote operates at the data layer — before anything reaches your model. Threats are caught at ingestion, during training, and across your RAG corpus. Prevention, not reaction.

Intercept threats before they enter training
Purpose-built for AI-specific threat vectors
Works with your existing ML pipeline
↓ entering the data layer
// Playground

See your data the way
your model sees it.

Explore, split, and validate your datasets visually before committing to training. Antidote flags bias, coverage gaps, and class imbalance — so you know what you're building on.

// Playground / Data Room
Understand your data before you train on it.

Import tabular datasets (CSV, Parquet, Arrow) and explore them visually before committing to training. Split into train/validation/test sets — and Antidote will tell you if the split can be created without introducing bias.

Visualise distributions, class balance, and coverage gaps
Define custom split ratios (e.g. 70/20/10) and validate feasibility
Focus on a specific class or condition — Antidote flags if there's enough quality data
Isolate any target label and verify it can be split without introducing bias contamination
// Dataset split — chest_xray_pneumonia
Train
70%
Validate
20%
Test
10%
✓ Split is feasible without introducing class bias across NORMAL / PNEUMONIA labels.
// Focus class selector
NORMAL PNEUMONIA
PNEUMONIA class: 4,273 samples · sufficient for training
Zone 03 — Data Layer

The threat taxonomy.
All six. Covered.

Six universal threat categories apply across every sector, pipeline, and model type. Each one is a failure mode Antidote is purpose-built to detect, remediate, and document.

// THREAT · 01
Poisoning & Contamination

Malicious inserts, compromised suppliers, insider changes, synthetic data abuse. Detects subtle and intentional alterations that mimic normal data and evade traditional anomaly detection.

// THREAT · 02
Mislabeling & Annotation Error

Human mistakes, inconsistent guidelines, label leakage, class imbalance distortions. Sequential engines identify deviation type — mislabel vs. poison vs. quality degradation.

// THREAT · 03
Outliers, Drift & Silent Corruption

Pipeline bugs, sensor changes, seasonality, new populations, domain shift. Continuous monitoring with "why changed" signals to identify the source before it affects training.

// THREAT · 04
Leakage & Policy Violations

PII/PHI, secrets, regulated data crossing boundaries, retention violations. Detection and redaction before data reaches model training or LLM summarization pipelines.

// THREAT · 05
RAG & Prompt Injection

Hidden instructions, malicious documents, contradictory sources, authority spoofing. Corpus monitoring flags suspicious inserts and contradiction patterns across your knowledge base.

// THREAT · 06
Shortcut Learning & Bias

Models learning the wrong pattern — performing in testing while failing silently in production. Antidote's dedicated Bias & Shortcuts scan reveals what your model actually learned and why.

// GDPR
Article 22 Compliance

Audit trails documenting every detection, remediation, and access event — supporting GDPR's requirements for explainability and data traceability in automated decision systems.

// EU AI Act
High-Risk AI Coverage

The EU AI Act mandates monitoring of data integrity and data drift for high-risk AI systems. Antidote's reporting module is purpose-built to satisfy these requirements with configurable, export-ready reports.

// Integration
API & Pipeline Native

Integrates directly into ML pipelines via API or web interface. Webhooks, CI/CD compatibility, and MLOps toolchain interoperability — no disruption to your existing workflow.

// Scan completed: February 14th, 2026 · 20 min · MISLABEL
 
dataset: "chest_xray_pneumonia"
total_samples: 11712
scan_type: "MISLABEL"
 
findings: {
  critical: 0,
  high: 420,
  medium: 0,
  low: 0
}
 
top_finding: {
  type: "Label Mismatch",
  severity: "High",
  sample: "person152_bacteria_723.jpeg",
  assigned_label: "PNEUMONIA",
  suggested_label: "NORMAL",
  confidence: 0.94,
  reason: "Model evidence conflicts with assigned label,
           suggesting annotation error or label drift."
}
 
// 418 findings pending review. Remediation available.
$
chest_xray_pneumonia · Scan completed Feb 14th · 420 high-severity findings
// Finding type
Label Mismatch High
person152_bacteria_723.jpeg
PNEUMONIA → NORMAL · confidence 0.94
// Finding detail
Model evidence conflict
Model evidence conflicts with the assigned label, suggesting annotation error or label drift. Elevates accuracy risk in production.
// Dataset health
98% Health score
3 active vulns
// Quality metrics
Label Accuracy 100%
Mislabel Rate 3.6%
Poisoning Rate 0%
// Ready to discover the blindspots inside your pipeline?

You just saw what even highly curated,
public benchmark datasets hide.
What's lurking in yours?

Most teams see their first findings within hours.
No disruption to your stack. No data leaves your environment.

Pilot cohort limited to 10 teams · Currently accepting applications.